Insane New Theory About Mountains. Are They Ancient Trees?

Insane New Theory About Mountains. Are They Ancient Trees?

A new crazy theory makes the understanding of our life much more difficult.

For a long time there is a rumor on the web like the mountains we see are not really mountains, but trees. “Flat Earthers Theory 2” as it is called, says that our actual mountains from all over the world are not what they seem to be. Yes, you heard good: Trees.

Like we did, you surely laugh by hearing that, but a little comparation can easily change your mind.

© Inverse
© Inverse

How it started?

Last year, some boys posted an article in which are shown the diffrences between the mountains and the trees.

This idea got shared on many groups and it made a lot of people change their mind (just like Flat Earth Theory).

If the theory is true, it makes us question a lot of things about our life, things that will radically change the history of mankind. Can trees grow on other trees? Are they really Giant Ancient Trees?

On the following photos you will understand why this theory has so many fans:

Canada ©Secretenergy.com
Canada ©Secretenergy.com
Namibia ©Secretenergy.com
Namibia ©Secretenergy.com
Venezuela ©Secretenergy.com
Venezuela ©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Inverse
©Inverse
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com

 

It’s only you who can choose what to think!

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

4 Replies to “Insane New Theory About Mountains. Are They Ancient Trees?”

  1. Articles like this one are a large contributing factor to the word theory being taken so lightly. This isn’t a theory. It’s a bad postulate at best. Pretty photos, and they show the geometry of nature a bit, but the idea is a joke. There likely did used to be giant forests, there’s even thought to possibly have been a giant fungal forest before almost any animals were land based. But that’s not how mountains work. No, we don’t know everything. But we do know some things, enough to know that mountains are not trees. And spreading articles like this, while fun perhaps when spread to people that know better, there are going to be people who don’t know any better, take this as truth, or use things like this to dismiss actual theories.

    I’m sorry for my strong stance on this. I don’t mean to take away anyone’s enjoyment of the imagery, but these kinds of things bother me for the effect they have on people, especially as ammunition for anti-science groups.

  2. The word theory in science literally and simply means ”a Interpretation of of the facts” Facts are not theories and theories are not facts, they are actually different from one another. If you ask me the giant tree theory actually better interprets the world around us, over the mainstream theory on how these things formed. Which does not make nor obeys the Scientific method as we have yet to date observed any Volcanos erupting in perfect hexagonal patterns that are not to mention..Vertically formed.

  3. No one can deny that those things grew out of the ground…that much is obvious…so with that established lets ask…what grows like that out of the ground today…the answer…Trees…actually we also have the seed pods that fell from these trees…huge stone balls that are commonly found all over the earth…like most conspiracy’s this and the flat earth is very likely correct….

  4. An unusual but delightful perspective. Everyone is unique and contributes new ideas to the world. Many of our greatest scientists were laughed at in their time. I am open-minded, but I approach these things as a skeptic. Regarding this article; I will not comment on its merit in the scientific community.

Leave a Reply