Insane New Theory About Mountains. Are They Ancient Trees?

Insane New Theory About Mountains. Are They Ancient Trees?

Table of Contents

A new crazy theory makes the understanding of our life much more difficult.

For a long time there is a rumor on the web like the mountains we see are not really mountains, but trees. “Flat Earthers Theory 2″ as it is called, says that our actual mountains from all over the world are not what they seem to be. Yes, you heard good: Trees.

Like we did, you surely laugh by hearing that, but a little comparation can easily change your mind.

© Inverse
© Inverse

How it started?

Last year, some boys posted an article in which are shown the diffrences between the mountains and the trees.

This idea got shared on many groups and it made a lot of people change their mind (just like Flat Earth Theory).

If the theory is true, it makes us question a lot of things about our life, things that will radically change the history of mankind. Can trees grow on other trees? Are they really Giant Ancient Trees?

On the following photos you will understand why this theory has so many fans:

Canada ©Secretenergy.com
Canada ©Secretenergy.com
Namibia ©Secretenergy.com
Namibia ©Secretenergy.com
Venezuela ©Secretenergy.com
Venezuela ©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Inverse
©Inverse
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com
©Secretenergy.com

It’s only you who can choose what to think!

17 Replies to “Insane New Theory About Mountains. Are They Ancient Trees?”

  1. Articles like this one are a large contributing factor to the word theory being taken so lightly. This isn’t a theory. It’s a bad postulate at best. Pretty photos, and they show the geometry of nature a bit, but the idea is a joke. There likely did used to be giant forests, there’s even thought to possibly have been a giant fungal forest before almost any animals were land based. But that’s not how mountains work. No, we don’t know everything. But we do know some things, enough to know that mountains are not trees. And spreading articles like this, while fun perhaps when spread to people that know better, there are going to be people who don’t know any better, take this as truth, or use things like this to dismiss actual theories.

    I’m sorry for my strong stance on this. I don’t mean to take away anyone’s enjoyment of the imagery, but these kinds of things bother me for the effect they have on people, especially as ammunition for anti-science groups.

    1. Hey waltjrimmer, do you actually think that these tree stumps are volcanic spit ups just left like they are? Really someone had actually looked real close to our God given gifts and commented with their opinion. It works for me and ah I think it really is what they are saying it is. By the way a theory is just that a theory. It’s up to the others to believe or not. Just saying!

  2. The word theory in science literally and simply means ”a Interpretation of of the facts” Facts are not theories and theories are not facts, they are actually different from one another. If you ask me the giant tree theory actually better interprets the world around us, over the mainstream theory on how these things formed. Which does not make nor obeys the Scientific method as we have yet to date observed any Volcanos erupting in perfect hexagonal patterns that are not to mention..Vertically formed.

  3. No one can deny that those things grew out of the ground…that much is obvious…so with that established lets ask…what grows like that out of the ground today…the answer…Trees…actually we also have the seed pods that fell from these trees…huge stone balls that are commonly found all over the earth…like most conspiracy’s this and the flat earth is very likely correct….

  4. An unusual but delightful perspective. Everyone is unique and contributes new ideas to the world. Many of our greatest scientists were laughed at in their time. I am open-minded, but I approach these things as a skeptic. Regarding this article; I will not comment on its merit in the scientific community.

  5. Not sure how giant trees are conected to flat earth. But hexagonal formations are not formed from lava. A giant tree fits perfect. The real question is why should government tell everyone if they know. And why should they keep it a seecret. Unles our history is covered.

  6. Yes you have a new believer, i see it and it does seem logical with the bible Just like the mountains that look like giants, they are giants, I do believe this. Thank you.

  7. I think that there are mountains that look like tree stumps. But some of these pictures here show flattened mountains that were trees? How do they become that flat.? Giants with a gigantic saw? Maybe there are footprints or even bones of 50 meter tall creatures? Maybe the dinosaurs were intelligent and some of them used tools, but everything was lost 60 million years ago when that enormous meteor struck in the bay of Mexico? Who knows….

  8. There was more oxygen back when them trees was living I totally believe they were bible says there was giants too

  9. Where is the rest of the tree. Did they send it by skidder to the saw mill to make toothpicks. Jack in the bean stock knew about giant beans. Petrified trees exist. Imagine the size of the beavers in those days before metals for saw blades. Noah couldn’t cut wood for the hollywood type ark because there was no metals yet before the bronze age. Giant redwoods could have controlled fires around the base of trees controlled by clay barriers above the flame areas. Enough ,say 24 tree posts about 120 feet long, could be drawn together with ropes to make a barge. Animals could climb on to escape a localized flood. Can you find the Truth here.?

  10. The Book of Enoch, quoted in the bible, but excluded from the official Canon, says that the angels were ordered to cut down the trees before God sent the great flood. Why would they need to do that if they were normal sized trees and would have been destroyed by the flood anyway?

  11. Just the fact that this article is started with an insult “Insane” tells me there is truth in this belief. Every time we get close to the truth, we are ridiculed without any evidence to prove our theories wrong. In school we were taught to laugh at civilization who believed up until 75 years ago, that the earth was flat. Flat earther’s are ridiculed yet they have evidence, and the heliocentric model has NONE, ZERO evidence, only theories of man. I watched a video recently where an explorer dug out a piece of a mountain and the inner portion of the piece he took out, was made of wood. Just like we are the advanced civilization, yet the world is full of architecture that proves otherwise. They say they were built in the 1890’s during a time man was using hand carts and horses and wagons, no electricity, the roads were made of mud, but somehow they constructed marvels like the capitol building and grand central station. We are waking up to the lies. Stop ridiculing us, the jig is up

Leave a Reply to Sandra Hadley Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *